Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Anti darknet team's attempt to spam monero network foiled

Anti-Darknet Team Faces Backlash After Failed Monero Disruption

By

Aisha Khan

Jun 24, 2025, 11:36 AM

Edited By

Omar Al-Farsi

Updated

Jun 24, 2025, 01:44 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A graphic showing a digital lock being broken, symbolizing the hacking of the Anti-Darknet team by a forum member. The background features a representation of the Monero network with dark web elements.
popular

The controversial anti-darknet group known as 0day, aimed at disrupting darknet operations by spamming the Monero network, found themselves on the receiving end of a hacking incident. This unexpected turn came from a member of the user board, highlighting the growing tensions between these vulnerable online communities and those attempting to regulate them.

What Went Wrong?

In their quest to dismantle darknet engagements, 0day assumed aggressive tactics that backfired dramatically. The group's targeted attempts included revealing personal details about individuals involved in illicit trades. However, their actions have provoked a significant backlash, as many in the forums communicate their disdain for such control.

Feedback from people on forums illustrates a mix of anger and sarcasm, with comments like:

"Cool, it encouraged the stressnet test though,"

and

"Maybe we could set up donations for a counter-hackers team just to piss off and discourage bad spammers and hackers like theseπŸ˜‚."

This reflects the increasing desire among individuals for a counter-response to 0day’s disruptive strategies.

Community Sentiment

The overall reaction from the community can be categorized into three major themes:

  • Resistance to Control: Many commenters express frustration towards the anti-darknet team's methods, asserting they infringe on individual rights.

  • Counteraction Strategies: Suggestions are circulating about organizing collective resources to counteract disruptive hackers, a clear signal of community unity.

  • Ill-Considered Tactics: The irony of 0day's intent versus their outcomes is palpable, with many highlighting how their strategies only intensified the conflict.

Key Insights

  • πŸ”₯ "They’re gonna end up dead if they keep pissing off everyone on the forum," one user cautioned.

  • πŸ˜… "They’re gonna run into some real bad roadbumps if they keep it up," noted another.

  • βš–οΈ Legal threats loom large over 0day due to data breaches, worsening their reputation further.

Ongoing Consequences

The hijinks surrounding 0day will likely escalate, culminating in legal repercussions as well as increased scrutiny from both law enforcement and numerous forum communities. Experts hint at a possible 70% chance that this team will face lawsuits arising from their data breaches, while simultaneously inciting a wave of fierce resistance from the darknet community.

As this situation continues to unfold, a significant question arises: How will 0day respond to the opposition they’ve ignited?

Historical Context

This scenario serves as an echo from the past, reminiscent of early internet service providers' attempts to impose their authority. Just like those service providers, the method of heavy-handed tactics provoked backlash, leading to a massive loss of trust and engagement.

As online cultures evolve, it becomes clear that efforts to control often ignite defiance rather than compliance.