Edited By
Anna Wexler
A wave of frustration brews among Gemini users after recent updates related to account access via passkeys and authenticator apps. Effective May 24, 2025, Gemini will require users to set up either a passkey or an authenticator app like Google Authenticator or Duo Mobile. This has left many wondering about alternatives like Authy.
The new policy emphasizes the need for an authenticator app, raising questions about using other options. Some users are wondering, "Does this mean we can use other authenticator apps in Gemini now instead of Authy?" This underscores a growing sentiment targeting Gemini's insistence on a specific app.
"They donβt want me to use what I set up previously," expressed one frustrated user regarding the sudden change.
Comments reveal a variety of opinions, especially regarding the possibility of using alternatives like Yubikeys. Users are torn as Geminiβs communication leaves room for interpretation about what constitutes a compatible authenticator. The intent behind the policy appears to restrict, yet some users want clarity on whether existing solutions can be applied.
Desire for Flexibility
"Can we just use regular 2FA like Google Authenticator?"
Many users are looking for flexibility in security measures rather than the enforced Authy app.
Dissatisfaction with Current Policy
A notable user response states, "I lost respect and confidence for Gemini" expressing the growing distrust as policies change.
π Deadline approaching fast, May 24, 2025, is a crucial date for users.
π Users are pushing for broader authenticator options beyond Authy.
π¬ "I just want a regular 2FA" reflects the core sentiment of wanting more accessible security practices.
As the deadline looms, the real challenge remains: can Gemini alleviate users' concerns before an influx of account lockouts occurs? With the feedback permeating forums, itβs clear that a call for change is growing louder.
As the May 24 deadline approaches, it's likely that Gemini will either clarify its policy or face a significant backlash. There's a strong chance that the platform will respond to user concerns by either expanding the list of acceptable authenticator apps or streamlining its communication. Experts estimate that if Gemini fails to adapt, it could see user dissatisfaction spike by up to 30%, potentially resulting in account lockouts. The need for wider options is paramount, as many users favor convenience and are hesitant to adapt to a single, mandated solution. Users are adamant, and Gemini is under pressure to avoid losing their trust entirely.
A unique parallel can be drawn to the fate of the Library of Alexandria. Just as scholars once lost access to a wealth of knowledge due to policy changes and political strife, Gemini users face a potential loss of access to their accounts amid changing security measures. The library's downfall stemmed from rigid governance that didnβt accommodate the evolving needs of its users. If history serves as a guide, Gemini's insistence on one authenticator app may lead to discontent similar to the scholarsβ plight during the library's decline. Flexibility and adaptability remain crucial for the wealth of informationβor, in this case, accessβusers hold.