Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Building a fast amm: seeking resources and guidance

Fast AMM Development Sparks Debate | Are Speed and Security at Odds?

By

Igor Petrov

May 16, 2025, 06:35 PM

Edited By

Anna Wexler

Updated

May 17, 2025, 05:36 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A person working on a computer, exploring coding options for an Automated Market Maker project inspired by Uniswap, with charts and graphs displayed on the screen.

A user has announced plans to create a fast Automated Market Maker (AMM), inspired by Uniswap. However, this initiative has generated significant pushback in forums, as many experts highlight concerns about prioritizing speed over security.

Understanding the User's Ambition

The user stresses making the AMM fast, saying, "I want to build an AMM, but my priority is that it should be FAST." They intend to start with a Constant Product Market Maker (CPMM), later aiming to integrate more complex features. This ambition has led to a lively discussion about the implications of speed in AMM design.

Key Takeaways from the Community Discussion

  1. Security is Crucial: Contributors argue that security must take precedence. One user cautioned, "If you build fast, the only remarkable thing to happen is your AMM will be drained fast," underscoring the risks of a rapid approach.

  2. Chain Properties Matter: Some users noted that speed is often a characteristic of the underlying blockchain. A comment pointed out, "Speed is mostly tied to the chain properties," suggesting that different setups can significantly impact performance.

  3. Complexity of Uniswap's Architecture: Several users discussed the challenges of implementing advanced features found in Uniswap V3 and V4. A user stated, "Copying V3, however, will be insanely complex as you need to understand this architecture and math." This suggests a tension between implementing new designs and existing complexities.

"You'll need a better chain for that. Look out for a modular chain (fe. Flow), which is FAST and SCALABLE," another user advised, emphasizing the need for a suitable blockchain environment for success.

Community Sentiment Mixed

The overall sentiment in the forums is cautious yet supportive. While the ambition to innovate is recognized, many contributors call for a balanced approach. Some voices are notably critical, arguing for prioritizing vulnerabilities over features that could betray user trust.

User Perspectives

  • Positive Feedback: The eagerness to push forward with AMM technology received support.

  • Critical Insights: Many insist that overlooking security can lead to devastating failures. "A good priority would be an AMM that maximizes capital efficiency and minimizes slippage," one user asserted.

Key Points to Consider

  • ⚠️ "Your priority is reckless," one community member stated, urging them to consider security first.

  • πŸš€ Emphasis on security alongside speed could shape the project's future.

  • πŸ“š Resources recommended include studying Uniswap’s white papers to build foundational knowledge about AMMs.

Historically, the rush for innovation in industries often leads to preventable failures. As this user embarks on their AMM journey, will they heed the warnings from the community? The delicate balance of speed and safety in crypto could dictate the future success of their project.