A rising wave of frustration is sweeping through cardholders after many report unexpected downgrades from Jade to Midnight status. This shift has left people bewildered, raising critical questions about the policies that govern card benefits and the implications of unstaking their CRO.
Reports indicate that users believed maintaining a locked CRO stake for a year would secure their Jade status. However, many unwittingly downgraded their benefits after unstaking, creating confusion regarding the nuances of the system.
One commenter shared the reality: βYou lose all perks except those connected to your active card you possess.β It appears the misconception is widespread; several users echo similar sentiments across forums, highlighting a significant gap in messaging from the issuer. As one person exclaimed, "Airport lounges are great, but what good are they if I canβt use my card benefits?"
New insights confirm that cardholders must keep their CRO staked at all times to prevent a downgrade. If they unstake, regardless of how long the asset had been locked, the downgrade is automatic.
"To maintain Jade (or higher) card benefits, you need to keep the required amount of CRO staked at all times," one user reiterated, further signifying the need for clarity on the rules.
This dissatisfaction is evident in online discussions, as users comment on shared experiences:
Commonality of Issues: "This situation has happened to other users as well and is a common point of confusion."
Seeking Solutions: "If you believe there has been a mistake, contact support directly."
These echoed frustrations suggest a community desperate for improved communication and clearer guidance on how to navigate the change in status.
To regain their previous Jade status, affected people need to:
Restake the required CRO amount.
Reach out to support if they feel the downgrade was unwarranted.
π« "Unstaking your CRO results in a downgrade" β affecting many cardholders.
π There's a notable difference in policy understanding versus practical application.
π Direct support is essential for resolving individual issues.
As discussions continue, many hope for a clearer response from the card issuer regarding these significant policy gaps. Will there be new measures to protect people from unwarranted downgrades in the future? It's a pressing concern for the community.
Experts predict that ongoing frustrations could lead the issuer to clarify its staking policies and improve communication regarding cardholder benefits. Without these adjustments, thereβs a risk of losing up to 60% of cardholders who feel let down by the current setup. More transparency could restore user confidence and foster a better experience.
The current situation draws attention to historical parallels, notably the 2008 financial crisis, where ambiguous rules caused widespread confusion. Just as homebuyers faced unexpected hurdles, cardholders now find themselves navigating a complex benefits system. This scenario underscores the essential role of clear rules and robust support to maintain trust and confidence in financial services.