A rising tide of skepticism surrounds Cardano as recent actions spark outrage over a controversial minting event. The networkβs unnoticed deletion of 318 million ADA tokens in 2021βequivalent to $696 million at that timeβleaves many in the community unsettled about governance decisions and their effects.
In 2021, during a protocol upgrade, Cardano deleted 318 million ADA tokens only to mint the same amount into reserves for staking rewards. The overall ADA total remained unchanged, but the reasoning behind this action wasn't clearly communicated.
The protocolβs code, specifically the function returnRedeemAddrsToReserves, executed this process without cryptographic keys, leading some in the crypto community to question its legitimacy:
####### line 1121: Adds presale ADA to reserves
######## line 1122: Retains only regular UTxOs
"This sets a dangerous precedent," said a concerned community member. While some dismiss the situation as a "nothing burger," others are troubled by the unilateral decision made by IOG's genesis keys, which bypassed community involvement and sparked broader discussions about governance in the crypto space.
Ongoing discussions across user forums indicate a mix of apprehension and outrage. Key concerns include:
Trust Issues: Some argue this action undermines community trust, recalling IOG's history of unilateral decisions.
Demand for Transparency: Users are calling for more transparency in governance decisions, especially involving large sums like the erased 318 million ADA.
Confusion Over Staking: One commenter noted that the ADA deleted was not new but rather unclaimed tokens that had transitioned from ETH to Cardano. "Redistributing ADA that wasnβt claimed, is it really that bad?" they questioned, which complicates the narrative around the minting process.
In addition, information surfaced suggesting that the deleted ADA was staked in Charles Hoskinson's WAVE Digital pool, generating around 25 million ADA from staking. Critics highlight the lack of transparency regarding the subsequent movement of funds to unknown wallets without community knowledge. "Very fishy," said another commenter, emphasizing the demand for on-chain proof.
The fallout from this incident may prompt a shift in Cardanoβs governance model. With user skepticism on the rise, IOG may need to adopt more transparent practices, potentially including regular forums for community discussions to rebuild trust. Some estimates indicate a 60% chance of governance reforms following this controversy.
Reflecting on past corporate scandals raises an important question: Will this incident drive Cardano toward greater accountability and oversight? Just as stakeholders demanded changes post-Enron, the Cardano community may seek similar reforms, evolving into a more engaged body that holds leadership accountable for their actions.
β 318 million ADA was deleted and then minted into reserves.
β Users want greater transparency and involvement in governance.
β οΈ "Are we witnessing an erosion of trust?" questioned a member, capturing the growing anxiety surrounding the event.