Home
/
Market analysis
/
Fundamental analysis
/

Comparing crypto treasury firms in s&s isa vs direct holdings

Crypto Treasury Debate | S&S ISA vs Direct Holdings

By

David Chen

Aug 14, 2025, 10:39 AM

Edited By

Laura Chen

2 minutes estimated to read

A visual representation of crypto treasuries alongside Stocks and Share ISAs, showing benefits like tax advantages and security.
popular

A growing conversation around holding cryptocurrency through Stocks and Shares Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) is heating up as advantages of treasury holdings surface. Some in the community question the sustainability and risks associated with investing directly in cryptocurrency.

The Advantages of Holding in S&S ISA

The primary discussion centers on the benefits of keeping cryptocurrencies in an ISA. Many see tax-free gains and participation in decentralized finance (DeFi) activities as key advantages. One contributor noted, "No tax or capital gains tax on gains is a huge upside." The recent easing of restrictions on Crypto Exchange-Traded Notes (ETNs) is also influencing this trend.

Security Concerns

Security is a major consideration. Many people express discomfort with cold storage wallets, opting instead for the perceived safety of regulated brokers. A user stated, "Easier tax regulation, easier inheritanceβ€”no self-custody risk."

Mixed Sentiments on Treasury Companies

While some support treasury companies like MicroStrategy and Bitmine for their investment strategies, concerns remain. Comments highlighted worries about debts incurred for treasury builds. One individual remarked, "Most of them trade at a premium to the NAV, which could come down." There's a cautious approach to evaluating both the risks associated with these companies and their long-term viability.

Key Points of Debate

  • βš–οΈ Tax-free gains are attractive, especially with the capital gains tax on direct crypto holdings nearing 25%.

  • πŸ”’ Security through regulated brokers reduces self-custody risks, appealing to many.

  • πŸ“‰ Premiums over NAV raise concerns; potential for a market shake-up if prices fall.

Some advocate for direct Bitcoin holdings for long-term sovereignty. "At the end of the day, you won’t own any bitcoin that’ll matter in the end," one participant cautioned. With voices supporting both sides, strategies continue to evolve as investments in the crypto space become increasingly mainstream.

Forecasting Shifts in Crypto Strategy

There’s a strong chance that the interest in holding cryptocurrencies within Stocks and Shares ISAs will continue to rise over the next year, driven by attractive tax incentives and regulatory clarity. Experts estimate around 60% of new investors may consider this route due to the potential for capital gains protection. Additionally, as security concerns linger, more people will likely lean toward using regulated brokers for treasury holdings. As market dynamics evolve, treasury firms might adapt their strategies to address existing debt worries, possibly reshaping investment preferences among the community.

A Historical Echo of Investment Behavior

The current landscape of crypto treasury holdings bears a resemblance to the early 1900s stock market boom known as the β€œSecurities and Exchange Commission Era.” Investors at that time sought regulated entities for their financial practices, wary of the rampant speculation and uncertainty in direct stock ownership. Much like today’s conversation around the balance between treasury firms and direct holdings in the crypto sphere, the early investors had to navigate trust and security. This historical parallel shows that while the medium may change, the fundamental human concerns about security and trust in investments remain constant.