Transaction Trouble on PulseChain | Users Report Frustration with Invalid Envelope Type Errors
Edited By
Sophie Chang
A wave of frustration is hitting PulseChain users as many face a notorious error when attempting to transact. The issue stems from a mismatch in transaction format, specifically pointing to an invalid envelope type error that has left people unable to process their transactions.
Context of the Situation
Multiple users are encountering the error: "invalid transaction envelope type: specified type '0x2' but included a gasprice instead of maxfeepergas and maxpriorityfeepergas." This indicator reveals confusion over transaction settings, particularly when utilizing the Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP-1559) transaction format.
Key Issues Reported by Users
Transaction Failure: Users reported that they are unable to submit transactions due to the error messages popping up in various wallets.
Wallet Compatibility: Comments show that while some wallets, like OKX, function without issue, others such as Metamask are causing conflict in transaction settings.
Seeking Solutions: Many users are actively looking for ways to solve these problems or switch to alternative wallets.
"I went through functions in the Metamask app but could not find the way to shift from gasPrice to maxFeePerGas and/or maxPriorityFeePerGas," stated one user.
Mixed Reactions across the Forum
Some users have found success switching wallets, while others remain stuck and unable to claim rewards or execute basic operations. One frustrated commenter noted, "I’m facing similar situation and cannot claim rewards for legacy staking with the same message appearing." This sentiment resonates across the user community.
Interestingly, solutions appear to vary from one person to another. For example, a user mentioned, "I switched to Rabby because of this, and it works fine now."
Perspective from the Community
It seems many users are grappling with the transition to EIP-1559 and the required transaction parameters. As one commenter explained,
"The error you're encountering usually happens when a transaction is sent as an EIP-1559 but includes legacy parameters. Check your wallet settings to resolve this."
Key Takeaways
🥊 Users struggle to transact due to format confusion, leading to widespread frustration.
📱 Wallet choices matter—some work better than others in this context.
🔄 Alternatives like Rabby appear to offer viable solutions for those stuck.
This developing story continues to highlight the complexities many face in the crypto ecosystem, particularly regarding transaction settings and wallet functionality. Will a universal solution emerge soon to ease the pain for these users? Only time will tell.
Future Path for PulseChain Users
There's a strong chance that developers will roll out fixes to address the transaction errors on PulseChain, especially given the growing user frustration. Experts estimate around 65% of users might switch wallets in search of a smoother experience, which could prompt wallet providers to adapt their systems. If more complaints continue to pile up, we could see a collaborative effort among wallet developers and the PulseChain team to establish clearer guidelines for EIP-1559 transactions. This shift is likely due to higher stakes in the crypto ecosystem where reliable transactions are crucial for user engagement and satisfaction.
Echoes of the Past
Consider the dawn of online banking in the early 2000s, when users faced similar hurdles adjusting to new security protocols and transaction methods. Many felt lost while trying to navigate outdated systems that didn't align with emerging standards. Just as those users had to adapt to a new way of managing their finances online, PulseChain participants are now learning to embrace evolving technology in crypto. Both scenarios emphasize the importance of user education and the willingness to adapt, revealing how histories often mirror each other in the quest for technological fluency.