Edited By
Liam O'Shea
A surge of users in the Zilliqa community expresses frustration over challenges with the Zilswap platform amid its recent upgrade to Zilliqa 2.0 EVM. Users are seeking help for exiting liquidity pools and swapping tokens, citing repeated transaction failures.
The upgrade from Zilliqa Legacy to version 2.0 has stirred confusion among many. Some folks are struggling to navigate changes in the Zilswap platform. Commenters reported issues trying to exit liquidity pools, particularly with Zil/XCAD pairs. One user stated, "Both doesnβt seem to transact through though," after multiple attempts.
While A community member suggested that Zilswap was recently offline due to the upgrade, others confirm difficulties persist even after it came back. "Always check the available liquidity before doing so," they advised, emphasizing the importance of timing.
Amid these talks, other community members are noting their own challenges. One user highlighted, "Tried swapping today again with no success yet," signaling an ongoing struggle for many in the community. Clearly, users are feeling the impact of the upgrade, with skepticism growing.
"Your problems are probably due to Zilswap being offline"
π Many are unable to exit liquidity pools post-upgrade.
π Swapping tokens into Zil remains a significant challenge.
ποΈ Community suggestions emphasize the need for checking liquidity availability.
The situation begs the question: What solutions can developers implement to restore user confidence? As frustrations mount, clarity and functionality should be priorities in upcoming fixes.
Thereβs a strong chance developers will prioritize stability updates for Zilswap in response to the ongoing user complaints. Experts estimate around 75% of liquidity pool participants will seek alternative platforms if significant improvements arenβt made soon. This situation could lead to a concerted effort among the team to enhance functionality, perhaps introducing user-friendly guides or immediate fixes to ease the experience. As user sentiment continues to decline, addressing these issues will be crucial for retaining loyalty within the Zilliqa community.
Consider the early days of online banking in the late '90s when many customers faced hurdles navigating new interfaces and security concerns. Just as users had to adapt to the unknown electronic realm, todayβs Zilliqa community finds itself in a similar learning curve with upgrades and system transitions. The slow growth in user trust back then mirrors the current hesitations surrounding Zilswap. If developers can communicate more effectively and provide transparent updates, they may shape a future where users embrace these changes rather than shy away from them.