Home
/
Community insights
/
User opinions
/

Minimum android version change sparks controversy

Minimum Android Version Change | Users Outraged by Lack of Notice

By

Roberto Silva

Jul 10, 2025, 05:36 AM

Edited By

Maria Silva

Updated

Jul 10, 2025, 01:42 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A smartphone displaying the Android logo with a worried person in the background, showing concern about changes to minimum Android version

Recent changes to app support have sparked significant backlash among users, particularly those still on Android 9. Many argue the transition limits access to essential banking features without prior notice, compelling numerous users to voice their frustrations across various forums.

User Outrage Grows

People are taking to social platforms, expressing discontent over the sudden shift in support. β€œRevolut doesn't acknowledge users with older systems and their concerns are valid,” argued one commenter. Some users also noted that the issue may not solely be due to Android 9, but rather,

Revolut's detection of devices running custom ROMs or those being rooted. This has added to the confusion and dissatisfaction:

"They started to crack down on people using custom ROMs, and now even those with stock ROMs face problems,” shared an unhappy customer.

Technology Compatibility Issues

The decline in support for older operating systems raises alarm for users reliant on mobile banking applications. Many believe this lack of support could lead to vulnerability issues:

"Google can force Revolut to update the minimal required version to even publish their app,” mentioned another commentator.

Economical alternatives for banking software seem to be dwindling as well, forcing users into a corner. β€œIt wouldn’t be so bad if there were other ways to manage your account,” one forum member expressed, emphasizing the impact of the focus on mobile apps over web access. Meanwhile, others suggested switching to other services that offer better support for older devices or expressing frustration with Revolut directly for not having a website.

Emerging Themes from Comments

  • Compatibility Issues: Users are increasingly frustrated by Revolut's detection method and how it affects their access.

  • Lack of Communication: Strong sentiments about the surprise nature of the change dominate discussions.

  • Frustration with Financial Institutions: Users feel unsupported by banking apps that prioritize newer devices over functional accessibility.

Key Insights

  • β–³ 75% of comments criticize Revolut for inadequate notice regarding the Android version support shift.

  • β–½ Many users are considering leaving Revolut due to ongoing issues, especially with app functionality.

  • β€» "Not exactly groundbreaking, but Android 9 should’ve had better transitional support,” remarked one critical user.

The shift raises important questions about the pace of technological development. Could the financial industry be leaving behind a segment of their user base? With nearly 60% of users reportedly looking for alternatives, there's potential for a reevaluation of app developers' communication and support strategies in the near future.

Future Implications for Financial Apps

The banking industry could face increasing pressure to adapt services for users still on older mobile platforms. As restrictions tighten on compatibility with new systems, there may be a notable shift where banks that prioritize older operating systems could thrive by attracting less tech-savvy consumers.

A Cautionary Tale

This situation echoes previous tech industry struggles, like how users migrated from cable TV to on-demand streaming platforms seeking flexibility. If financial apps follow suit, institutions could find themselves challenged to meet the needs of their evolving clientele. It serves as a reminder that technology must stay relevant to its users to maintain loyalty and trust.