A seller is causing a stir by insisting on an additional $3,000 for a 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 9 after the buyer won it at auction for $25,750. The new demand complicates the transaction and has raised eyebrows among those in the car community.
The seller initially sought cash only and has since escalated his demand to $29,000, expressing dissatisfaction with the auction outcome. This has ignited significant backlash, with many car enthusiasts vocalizing their frustration on forums.
βHe sold it at βNo Reserveββthatβs your car!!β emphasizes the importance of sticking by auction terms.
Several commenters advised the buyer to βwalk awayβ, fearing the situation may worsen. One pointedly mentioned that the seller could retaliate if pressed to proceed with the sale.
Commenters weighed in on potential legal actions, mentioning that enforcing contracts in such cases can be complicated. As one noted: βCompelling someone to sell an asset through legal pressure is complicated.β Others mentioned that the seller will likely face consequences from the auction platform, where they could be banned from future sales, indicating that repercussions are not uncommon for unethical sellers.
βBAT wonβt be of much help, for the deadbeat seller.β
βExpect to find all sorts of issues with it.β regarding the vehicle's quality, as it has a rebuilt salvage title.
Despite the seller's stance, many believe the buyer holds the cards. The no reserve auction policy seems to provide strong footing for the buyer to decline the inflated fee. Since many participants are urging him to report the seller, the community is rallying around the buyer, echoing concerns over integrity in auction practices.
βThis is very bad for business, for all of us,β declared a commenter, highlighting the implications of the seller's actions on the auction platform's reputation.
β Original auction price: $25,750, a fair win.
β Seller's inflated demand: now $29,000, viewed as unreasonable.
βοΈ Legal concerns: Enforcement may lead to complications and costs.
In the climate of ongoing discussions about transparency in auctions, this situation serves as a cautionary tale, reminding buyers to be vigilant and prepared for unexpected challenges. How will this affect future auction dynamics in the automotive market? Time will tell.