Home
/
Community insights
/
Expert interviews
/

Pow.re ceo says mining monopolies, not micro strategy, are enemy

MicroStrategy | Mining Monopolies Threaten Bitcoin, Says Pow.re CEO

By

David Morgan

Jun 5, 2025, 10:32 PM

Edited By

Fatima Khan

2 minutes estimated to read

Pow.re CEO at a podium discussing the dangers of mining monopolies in cryptocurrency
popular

In a pointed statement, Mike Cohen, CEO of Pow.re, warns that mining monopolies represent a significant threat to Bitcoin's decentralization more than major institutional players like MicroStrategy. With increasing institutional interest and state involvement, the centralization of Bitcoin mining raises concerns about potential risks, including 51% attacks and transaction censorship.

The Centralization Concern

Cohen's comments come amid a growing dialogue in the crypto community about the integrity of Bitcoin. "Corporate greed will never vanish," one commenter noted, highlighting a common sentiment. Many agree that both mining monopolies and institutional holders can pose risks to the network.

Interestingly, Cohen emphasized how crucial it is to distribute the hash rate across the Bitcoin network to maintain its security and decentralization. This concern isn’t just theoretical; it addresses real vulnerabilities that could arise if too much control is placed in the hands of a few.

Expanding Operations

In a bid to bolster the Bitcoin ecosystem, Pow.re is also expanding operations by merging with Block Green AG to enhance Bitcoin credit infrastructure. This move aims to further address issues surrounding Bitcoin's future and accessibility.

User Reactions

The online reactions reflect a mix of sentiments:

  • Diverse Views: "Think both are to be honest," reflects some unease about the current landscape.

  • Caution and Strategy: As one commenter put it, "I’m not mortgaging my home for more bitcoin now." This highlights a strategic approach among people amidst market uncertainty.

Key Insights

  • β—Ύ Cohen warns that mining monopolies can undermine Bitcoin’s core principles.

  • β–Ί "The centralization poses risks like transaction censorship," emphasizes Cohen.

  • β–½ "I’ll just buy and add to my stack in the depths of the bear market," suggests a buying strategy during downturns.

Despite the challenges, users and investors remain focused on the long-term potential of Bitcoin, cautiously navigating the complexities of the mining industry. Can the community rally together to prevent consolidation in this landscape? Only time will tell.

Expectations in the Bitcoin Arena

There’s a strong chance that if mining monopolies continue to grow unchecked, we may see calls for regulatory interventions to ensure fair access to Bitcoin mining. Experts estimate there's about a 60% probability that new legislation will emerge this year aimed at decentralizing mining operations. This movement could lead to increased competition, possibly reversing some current trends. However, a failure to address these centralization concerns might empower a few large players and create opportunities for market distortion, making it more difficult for smaller miners and investors to thrive.

Lessons from the Past: The Race for Electricity

An interesting parallel can be drawn from the early days of electricity, where monopolies controlled power generation, stifling competition and innovation. Similar to today’s crypto mining landscape, these electric monopolies faced backlash from the public. Grassroots movements eventually emerged, pushing for decentralized sources and innovations like hydroelectric power. This historical push for fairness can remind us of the potential for community-led efforts in Bitcoin to foster an environment not beholden to central powers.