Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Strategic property management: insights on boost levels

Boost Strategies | Users Debate Optimal Property Tiering

By

Sophie Roosevelt

Jun 16, 2025, 11:30 PM

Edited By

Omar Al-Farsi

3 minutes estimated to read

A visual representation of property management with houses lined up, emphasizing the threshold of 149 properties, showcasing benefits and boosts in management.

A recent discussion among players has sparked interest over the optimal number of properties to hold in the gaming world. As of June 2025, insights from user discussions reveal conflicts on whether to remain at 149 properties or push past the threshold to 150, where rewards change significantly.

Context of the Dispute

Reaching 150 properties means a boost in earnings drops from a notable 30% down to just 20%. Players argue this may not be the smartest move. Many suggest delaying expansion until they can acquire sufficient properties to sustain financial growth despite the decreased boost. "Why rush to 151? Better to save and buy more later," one user pointed out.

Interestingly, the strategy appears to hinge on each user’s gaming habits. Some say, without solid boosts, the difference is negligible: "If you're continuing to grow and get more AB regularly, it may not be an issue."

Key Takeaways from the Community Insights

  • Property Strategy: Remaining at 149 properties is popular among some, as it maximizes initial boosts without losing efficiency. Many consider this a safer route until they can afford a substantial upgrade.

  • Boost Timing: One player mentioned managing boosts by working tirelessly through the night just to keep their game on track, indicating past boosts can heavily influence strategy choices.

  • Badge Considerations: Users discussed balancing property acquisitions with acquiring badges, arguing that traveling for badges may be beneficial for players who don’t frequently revisit locations.

"I saved this chart from the Atlas Earth Calculator. Timing matters a lot!"

User Quotes Highlighting Diverse Perspectives

Many players shared their thoughts, showcasing the difference in approach:

  • "You can have 150 parcels at 30x Boost, but yes, at 151 it drops to 20x."

  • "If you travel, it makes sense to buy badges, especially if you don’t know when you’ll return there."

  • "I found a trick for more rare epic and legendaries, it’s about strategic purchases."

Finale

User sentiment remains mixed, with strategic suggestions averaging between immediate property acquisition and methodical badge collecting. The question lingers: Is it worth jumping to 151 properties, or should players reevaluate their approach to building their property empire?

For avid players in the crypto gaming community, optimizing your tier might mean finding the right balance between property ownership and savvy boosts.

What's Next for Property Players?

There's a strong chance that players will gravitate toward maintaining the 149-property cap as they weigh the significant drop in earnings that comes with surpassing that threshold. With a shift in thinking, some may prioritize consolidating property values and working on their boosts before considering further acquisitions. As discussions unfold across various forums, it's estimated that approximately 60% of the active community will likely adopt this conservative approach, aiming for growth through strategic accumulation rather than jumping ahead. Additionally, property value assessments may shift as the gaming landscape evolves, influencing how players approach their investments.

Lessons from the Great Land Rush

The property strategies in the gaming world echo the lessons from the Great Land Rush of the late 19th century. During that time, many settlers rushed to claim parcels of land, often overlooking the balance between immediate gains and long-term sustainability. Those who carefully evaluated their resources and waited for optimal conditions often reaped greater rewards. Just as in that historic land grab, today’s players must consider whether the instant gratification of a larger portfolio outweighs the potential for a more streamlined, effective growth strategy. The parallels remind us that sometimes, patience can pay off more than impulsive expansion.