Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Troubleshooting python bot issues with jupiter transactions

Python Bot Troubles | Developers Raising Concerns Over Jupiter Transactions

By

Fatima Al-Nasser

May 18, 2025, 11:41 AM

Edited By

Olivia Jones

Updated

May 18, 2025, 06:37 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A developer looks frustrated in front of their computer screen showing Python code and cryptocurrency transaction errors.

Developers are increasingly frustrated with a Python bot that fails to execute transactions through Jupiter. Reports have surfaced of issues even with minimal transactions, casting doubt on the reliability of the tools used by traders.

Transaction Troubles Continue

Many programmers have turned to forums for troubleshooting help. One participant commented, "Jupiter refuses to give me any transactions, not even a single ETH or any SOL," highlighting the struggles of those with funded wallets. Others confirmed their experiences, noting even transaction attempts as low as 0.1 SOL end in failure.

Insights from the Community

The online community has begun providing alternative suggestions. One user emphasized, "Switch to Rust," recommending the language for building bots due to its efficiency and reliability. Another stated, "Build the instructions manually instead of using Jupiter," suggesting a reliance on more direct methods could be beneficial. Moreover, one developer pointed out that using the official Jupiter Python SDK might help in fetching quotes and building transactions, despite its early-stage limitations.

"It can be a pain at the beginning, but once you get familiar with Rust, there's no going back," remarked a user who has converted their development to Rust.

Addressing Key Themes in the Discourse

From the ongoing discussions, three core themes have crystallized:

  1. Language Shift: There's a call for developers to transition from Python to more robust languages like Rust or TypeScript to save time and improve functionality.

  2. Manual Solutions: Users are increasingly advocating for manual instruction building rather than relying solely on existing platforms like Jupiter.

  3. Technical Support: The lack of reliable support and documentation is a vital concern among developers, fueling doubts about the effectiveness of current tools.

Key Takeaways

  • ⚠ Many developers report failures in transaction capabilities, raising alarms about reliability.

  • πŸ”„ A segment of programmers are migrating their projects to Rust for enhanced performance.

  • πŸ“ "We need reliable tools to thrive in this space. Otherwise, what's the point?" - This sentiment captures the urgency for improvement in trading tools.

As these issues unfold, the developer community remains watchful for solutions that can either foster advancements in automated trading or fail to address ongoing challenges. The next few weeks are crucial for determining the future reliability of these tools in the crypto space.