Home
/
Market analysis
/
Price trends
/

Qubic's alleged assault on monero: fact check on fud

Qubic's Alleged Assault on Monero | Fact Check on FUD

By

Olivia Chen

Aug 17, 2025, 05:36 AM

Edited By

Anna Wexler

Updated

Aug 17, 2025, 09:33 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

Illustration showing a digital representation of Monero with visual elements indicating misinformation and market analysis
popular

Recent discussions around Qubic and Monero (XMR) have taken a heated turn, as misinformation claims about a potential 51% attack circulate. However, experts assert this narrative reflects an organized FUD campaign rather than a legitimate threat.

Details and Developments

While listening to Monero Talk's Episode 227, analysts pointed to misleading reports from outlets like Cointelegraph. In contrast, The Block offered a more nuanced view of the situation. Bawdyanarchist described this so-called attack as a coordinated effort within exchanges, suggesting they aim to manipulate market sentiment during ongoing volatility. Monero withdrawals are currently limited to Kraken, heightening concerns about liquidity.

Community Skepticism

Community members have echoed similar sentiments:

  • "We are definitely not being told the full story," noted one commenter, underscoring discontent with the information flow.

  • Another user warned, "This could escalate to a 30%+ attack with selfish mining and market disruption"β€”indicating a fear of significant market manipulation.

New Insights from the Discussion

Recent comments introduced additional perspectives on the ongoing situation:

  • One user mentioned, "If they could control the network continuously, they’d be able to revert transactions, hence making it a 51% attack." This raises questions about the current hash power control.

  • A reminder of a notable event on August 17, where a nine-chain reorg occurred, went largely unnoticed by the public, hinting at significant underlying issues in the network's stability.

Implications for Monero

This situation places pressure on exchanges to maintain trust. Analysts highlight the possibility that a failure to address these concerns could lead to a decline in user confidence, shifting how transactions and news are disseminated in the crypto space.

"No party has lost money due to reversed transactions during re-orgs," stated a concerned community member, emphasizing the perceived safety of funds despite operational disruptions.

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”„ "This isn’t a 51% attack; it’s FUD to crash the price," a user emphasized.

  • ⚠️ Speculation continues about the potential for market manipulation tactics, especially in bearish conditions.

  • πŸ’¬ Many community members are urging calm and highlighting the underlying technology’s resilience amid rumors.

As the fallout develops, the need for transparency from exchanges is more pressing than ever. Can the crypto community emerge from this challenge stronger and more vigilant?