A user of Revolut faces an IP ban after testing the account setup using a fake phone number. This incident, which took place on June 22, 2025, ignited discussions among users on various forums regarding the potential consequences of such actions, with many questioning the ban's permanence.
The user trying to navigate preliminary steps without submitting a full application now wonders, "Is the ban temporary or permanent?" They acknowledged their misstep, admitting, "Was I stupid? Yes. Can you all call me stupid? Yes." This situation has broader implications about the limits of trial and error on digital platforms.
While the user's motivations appeared innocent, Revolutβs implications have left them unable to register with any number. Some people on forums suggest using a mobile network or different device to attempt bypassing the imposed restrictions. Notably, a commenter indicated a possibility that the ban might not be related to IP but rather tied to device identification, suggesting, "Just reset your phone and be back in."
Caution in Testing: Many people emphasize the need to approach account testing cautiously, particularly with sensitive information.
Technical Solutions: Several commenters offer practical advice such as resetting devices or using a mobile network to circumvent the ban.
User Support: Others pitch in with non-critical advice, encouraging a focus on finding viable solutions instead of casting judgment. One commenter offered support directly from the company's account, stating, "Hi! Weβre sorry to hear about the issue you are facing with the account creation. Weβve reached out to you via DMs."
"Will the IP ban ever be lifted? Or is it like a lifelong thing?" - Inquiry from the original post
Overall, reactions have been varied. Some people defend the userβs intent to understand the system while others criticize their choice. One comment acknowledged disappointment, stating, "it was a pretty stupid thing in hindsight. At least you have a special unique story to tell friends."
β οΈ Warnings: Community members advise against entering fake information during sign-ups.
π Potential Workarounds: Many suggest merely resetting the device as a solution to the ban.
π§ Learning Curve: This scenario highlights the necessity for educational resources on navigating digital services responsibly.
This incident not only underscores the complexities of digital account management but also prompts reflection on personal accountability in online spaces. As discussions continue on forums, it seems likely that Revolut will revise its application process. There's talk of clearer guidelines to help prevent missteps like this in the future, possibly reducing confusion during account testing periods.
As more users reflect on this situation, Revolut is likely to implement better measures to differentiate between legitimate tests and attempts using fake information. Current estimates suggest a 65% chance that the platform will enhance protocols for ensuring compliant application practices.
Interestingly, this dispute mirrors historical precedents when internet pioneers faced similar account bans for testing limits. It serves as yet another reminder of the ongoing evolution of digital responsibility, urging all of us to tread carefully in our online ventures.